Text Size: Zoom In

Politically Correct

I’ve been watching the way some of us use the phrase politically correct to characterize the other side in an issue of public debate. As I understand it, many of us use the term PC to refer to the social pressure we feel to accept and respect groups that we think should be opposed or at least limited.

In an age of increased globalization and social mixing, a politically correct position would be one that tries to minimize offense to those whose beliefs or values we ourselves do not hold.

Where I find myself off balance is when I realize I am part of a community that often takes pride in being politically incorrect. On one hand I’m OK with this. I understand the need for non-conformity and social dissent. I recognize the prophetic role of the prophets of Israel who often gave their lives to deliver a message their countrymen didn’t want to hear. I honor the courage and wisdom of the Apostle Paul who wrote, “Am I now trying to win the approval of men, or of God? Or am I trying to please men? If I were still trying to please men, I would not be a servant of Christ” (Gal 1:10).

But there’s another side to this too. Sometimes, I have noticed that those we would accuse of being politically correct seem to care more than we do about minority groups that I know God also loves and cares about far more than we do.

Sometimes, not always, but sometimes the other side is quicker to advocate for humanitarian considerations for people that we think are suffering as a result of their own moral choices, religious affiliation, or social characteristics.

Before I go on, let’s stop here.

What are you thinking? Do you suspect that I’m caving in to social pressure to tolerate groups that need to be limited? Or do you also find yourself at times wondering whether Jesus would object to political correctness as quickly as we sometimes do? I’m being a bit vague because I’d like to hear us express both sides of this issue?


Vote on whether you think this post is something you'll be thinking about:
Vote This Post DownVote This Post Up (+6 rating, 6 votes)
Loading...
15 Comments »

15 Responses to “Politically Correct”

  1. meandmy4grlz says:

    I went to reply earlier, but I just couldn’t find the words. Then I received an email from a friend, talking about schools that will be participating in a “Day of Silence”. A nationwide push to promote the homosexual lifestyle in public schools.

    This is a prime example of our government using PC in an unfair way. It also shows the effects of taking “God” out of our schools.

    I don’t understand how we as a people are so affraid of affending these “social groups”? If there is a day to recognize gays or the minority community, why is it wrong for us to talk about God in our schools, and/or have a day publically celebrating Christ and our faith?

    These forms of PC, only cause segrigation and conflict. We are being asked to keep our kids home in protest of this day. Though I understand why, I am not pleased that my children’s education will be disrupted as a result.

    Why is it that there is fault found in quietly bowing your head in prayer before a test, yet it is acceptable to cause conflict in the name of PCness?

  2. Lenore says:

    It is a sign of the times. The birth pains have begun.

  3. Roycer924 says:

    Political Correctness defines itself, i.e. it’s only and all about ascribing to and forwarding a man-made (vs. God-made) construct. (And in this case, a construct and term created by no less an evil person than Stalin himself–which in and of itself should be sufficient reason to fear and fight against it.)

    If one needs further evidence of how to assess and respond to PCness simply observe those who embrace and promote it and see if they are God-centric or politically (man)-centric.

  4. Mart De Haan says:

    I hear you. But what if we combine “political correctness” with the right motives, and with a desire to respect minority groups to the honor of God?

  5. Roycer924 says:

    One can respect (and actually better affect true respect) without embracing or including “political correctness” and furthering its larger potential dangers.

    Right motives will not assure goodness nor a good outcome–especially so if Christianity is compromised (one the objectives and also the results of the PC movement).

    One is quickly reminded of the old chestnut: “The road to hell is paved with good intentions.” There’s an abundance of evidence of ” well-intended” social movements, trends, and governance in the past 50 years that have only lead to further decay.

    The nexus issue is: Do we want to do good or feel good?

  6. Mart De Haan says:

    Roycer924, I say let’s do good within the two counter balancing boundaries of truth and grace. If we are talking past each other, it would help me to know how you are defining political correctness.

  7. proverbs4u says:

    A common theme exists from all the comments. Are we here to serve God or man? Everyone is afraid of being classified as someone who discriminates. My heros, God and Jesus, discriminate against all who do not believe in Him or his son Jesus or the prophets before Jesus. You can not believe in some of the bible, as so many in our modern day do with most things they take things out of context and therefore call it the truth, and make yourself feel good.

    For the “day of silence”, by keeping our children out of school you give them the greatest educational boost you could ever ask, “I do this to honor GOD!”. Use it as a day of prayer. Then lets get organized and petition all these schools for a day of silence for Jesus and God.

    To follow Gods laws and the teachings of Jesus will result in persecution. Better to be persecuted then to be lead to the slaughter.

    May the spirit of Christs crucifixiotion give us all the courage to follow him. Happy Easter!!

  8. Mart De Haan says:

    Thanks, proverbs4u,for responding. You’re right that following Jesus is no way to please people. Discernment goes with our confidence that the Bible reveals the truth of God. But how we express that discernment is the issue. Jesus was full of grace and truth. So the question we need to ask is, how did he respond to sinners? Without ever going soft on sin, his hardest rebukes were to the Pharisees– and yet his “woes” to them were not said in condemnation but in lament. He did not come to condemn but to rescue. If the world is going to hate us, let them hate us for being willing to tell them the truth– in the love and grace of Christ.

  9. docgreen says:

    Who are we as Christians? Are we defined by our 20th and 21st century political affiliation? Which temporal issues should Christians be most concerned about? Is it true that only those who vote Republican are “true Christians?”
    As an academic and follower of Christ I am troubled by how some who proclaim Christ seem to mix up PC with their own biases toward certain issues they see as “not Christian.” What a list that might be if someone went through the NT or the Psalms to see what Christ had to say about racial reconciliation the environment, prejudice, greed, forgiveness, et al. We should be very careful not to lead with our politics but with our love not just for an unseen God, but for our fellow man whom we see everyday. “How can you say you love God” whom you have not seen, and hate your brother.” Political agendas can blind us to Christ’s message, and in some cases may actually lead us away from the the truth of the Gospel message.

  10. igetbored says:

    We are all God’s childrern regardless of race or financial status. With that being said let’s get to the meat of the matter. Those on the left in this world and in this country are using political correctness as a weapon to shut up and shut down christianity. Their goal is to censor any pastor, church, tv or radio host, and reading material that preaches the word of God. Here’s the kicker their already winning because the church has laid down for fear of speaking out against homosexuals or Muslims or any other group of people living in sin. Why is it that prayer or bible reading is forbidden in schools but Islam is now being taught? This has the stench of the antichrist all over it as he pushes for a one world religon. Yes even you Mr. Mart De Haan may some day be censored along with this website. I sure hope not though because I’m having fun seeing how much of the truth you will let me say. May Jesus bless you and your family.

  11. docgreen says:

    Hello igetbord,

    The heart of the matter is whether the church can be the leader in the issue of racial reconciliation. We find in our country that this issue has worn many faces over time, from outright racial hatred to the church turning a blind eye to injustice, to indifference for the sake of the concept called “color blindness.” Physical difference is not what separates people but intolerance and hate borne of a darkened heart. Political correctness is not the true enemy of the church, but our own attitude toward others who claim Christ. You and I probably both grew up with prayer and the pledge, (I do not have a problem with either) but I suspect our experiences with the larger society may have been very different. Let’s hope the body of Christ can be the example of racial reconciliation in the 21st century.

  12. oledawg says:

    All responders,

    This is my first post on this forum, so I’ll try to keep my comments brief, but I cannot help but bring up a few points for your consideration.

    The definition of “Politically Correct”:

    My Pocket Webster, published in 1990 has nothing at all to offer.

    My Webster’s New World Dictionary, published in 1996 states:
    “Holding orthodox liberal political views: usually used to connote dogmatism, excessive sensitivity to minority causes, etc.”

    In my personal view, both Webster’s editions miss the mark. I then looked up the term at Wikipedia and read the entry thoroughly.

    I suggest those interested in the term should do the same. Being a conservative, I take issues with the liberal bias revealed therein, but all in all, it is pretty much right on with respect to history and current usage.

    Having been retired for some time, I have had a lot of time to watch the world’s political systems in action and I make no bones about my conservative bias, which I temper with my fairly limited knowledge of Scripture.

    That said, please do not think I am a hit-and-miss reader of Scripture, I have also had a lot of time to study writings of those far more knowledgeable than I and have learned enough to understand the difference between liberal and conservative interpretations and teaching.

    The internet is a wonderful resource for my enlightenment. All that is required of me is the time and determination to read and discern, with a lot of help from the Holy Spirit who counsels me.

    I highly recommend visiting the topic at

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Politically_correct

    and read the information there. Read the whole article carefully and you will be enlightened as to the contemporary usage of the term. Then reconcile what you have learned with Scriptural doctrine and again read the previous posts. I am certain there will be a lively discussion of the term as it is now used.

    I am sorry for the lengthy post, I do tend to go on and on.

    Respectfully,

    oledawg

    P.S. Unfortunately, I cannot help but add that I tend to relate the term “Political Correctness” to the theme of the book “Animal Farm”. However, please feel free to draw your own conclusions.

  13. johndow says:

    johndow says,
    PC is nothing new…you only have to read the 3rd chapter of the letter of James in the New Testament to realise why.

    Submitted at 17.15pm on Thu,26th March 2009

Leave a Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.